This year, the Great Books campers on the Stanford campus weren’t greeted with the usual spiral-bound paper anthologies with all the coursework…they were given Nooks. The Stanford campus was a pilot program to see if using eReaders loaded with all of the reading material was easier or better than using the anthologies. Below is the feedback.
From The Great Books Inquirer:
Although the Nooks seem far better than the printed anthologies, they did present problems of their own. Nielsen reported that some students were unhappy with certain aspects of the Nooks. With the paper anthologies, campers can easily highlight passages and take notes directly on the readings. The Nooks do not make this process efficient.
The Nooks are smaller and less compact than the anthologies, but they are machines, and machines don’t always work perfectly. The Nooks did not openly display the remaining battery power; so many students did not realize how low the power level was on their Nooks. Occasionally during lectures campers would lose power on their Nooks and would not be able to access the text. Some Nooks were damaged or dropped. Most campers kept the eReaders in their backpacks, where they also kept their water bottles. Many of the Nooks were damaged from being in close proximity to the water bottles, and all were replaced instead of repaired.
Stanford’s use of eReaders has stirred up some controversy among campers and Program Assistants. Although certain aspects of the Anthologies were missed, the majority of students preferred the Nook over the anthology, and even those who missed the anthology had few complaints. The students most upset by the Nooks were mostly frustrated with the Nook’s flawed programming.
Which would you prefer and why?